Fact-check a clinical claim

Paste a slide headline, footnote, or written claim and attach the source study. Anara checks whether the wording reflects the study methodology and findings, flags anything that overstates the evidence, and suggests revised language. Use it to catch problems before MLR or regulatory review does.

Prompt

A medical communications consultant checks a headline for a cardiovascular slide program built on a NHANES-based modeling study.

I need to verify whether this slide headline is accurate given the underlying study. Attached: the source paper.

Headline: "Comprehensive Risk Factor Control, Led by Intensive LDL-C Lowering, Can Substantially Reduce Projected Recurrent ASCVD Events"

Please assess: Is this headline accurate given the study's methodology and findings? Does it overstate or understate the results? Is "projected" the right framing for a modeling study versus an RCT outcome? Suggest one or two alternative phrasings if the current version has accuracy concerns.

What to add to your library

• Required: the claim, headline, or footnote, pasted into the chat.
• Required: the source study, as a PDF upload or from your library.
• Optional: the regulatory context (MLR review, FDA submission, payer dossier, advisory board), so Anara calibrates its precision.
• Optional: a description of the chart the headline accompanies.

What you get

• A verdict: accurate, overstated, understated, or potentially misleading.
• The specific passage from the study that grounds the verdict.
• Revised phrasing wherever the original does not hold up.

Follow-ups

Verify the numbers in the body copy.

The slide body copy states that risk factor control could reduce recurrent ASCVD events by 34% in the high-risk population. Check this figure against the paper's Table 3 results. Does the percentage match? Is "high-risk population" the correct descriptor for the subgroup analyzed?

Check every claim across a slide deck.

I have attached the full slide deck and the three source studies it references. For each slide that makes a quantitative clinical claim, check the claim against the study it cites. Flag anything that does not match and anything where the citation is missing. Return your findings as a list organized by slide number.

Tips

• Paste the claim verbatim. The check depends on exact wording, not a paraphrase.
• Ask pointed questions ("is 'projected' accurate for a modeling study?"). "Is this generally right" gets a softer assessment.
• Anara only sees the study you upload, not internal briefings or your MLR team's red lines. If they conflict, trust the prior guidance.
• Run revised wording through the same check before the file moves forward.