Draft a medico-legal narrative

Upload the medical records for a case, name the body part and the injury date, and Anara searches every uploaded report for relevant findings and drafts a chronological narrative grounded in what the records say. Use it when a written case history has to come out of a thick stack of documentation.

Prompt

A medical case analyst needs a right shoulder narrative from a workers' compensation file of eight physician reports. Run one body part per chat.

I need a medico-legal narrative history for the right shoulder. The injury date is March 14, 2022. My library contains the full medical file for this case.

Search all uploaded documents for any findings related to the right shoulder, diagnoses, imaging results, treatment notes, functional limitations, and physician opinions, that fall before and after the injury date. Draft a clear, chronological, strictly prose narrative covering the pre-injury history, the acute injury findings, and the treatment course to the present date. Do not use bullet points or headers. Cite each finding to its source document. If any physician or report referenced in the documents is not in my library, flag it at the end.

What to add to your library

• Required: all available records for the case, in a case-specific folder. The more complete the set, the more comprehensive the narrative.
• Optional: the injury date, the case type, such as workers' compensation, personal injury, or disability evaluation, and any apportionment parameters.

What you get

• A chronological prose narrative of every finding on that body part, from earliest history to the most recent note.
• Each claim attributed to its source document.
• A list at the end of physicians or reports referenced in the file but missing from your library.

Follow-ups

Summarize the functional impact.

Produce a functional impact summary for the right shoulder. List five self-reported changes to daily activities, five physical restrictions documented by treating physicians, and five occupational activities incompatible with the documented limitations. One sentence each.

Run the apportionment analysis.

Based on the records you reviewed, provide an apportionment analysis for the right shoulder. Identify the findings that pre-date the industrial injury and those that post-date it. Describe what the records say about the relative contribution of pre-existing conditions versus the industrial injury to the current clinical picture. Cite the specific passages used.

Tips

• Name the body part and side, and run one body part per chat.
• Include the injury date as the temporal anchor, or findings cannot be framed as pre-injury and post-injury.
• Ask for strictly prose with no bullet points, and for missing records flagged at the end rather than mid-narrative.
• Findings described obliquely can be missed. Check a record you know matters, and paste the passage in if it was skipped.