Draft an ESG narrative
Draft the narrative sections of a sustainability report from your source documents.
Upload your materiality assessment, stakeholder input, and prior reports, and Anara drafts the narrative sections of your sustainability report under CSRD or GRI double materiality framing. It drafts from the documents you provide, not from general knowledge of what reports usually say.
Prompt
A sustainability consultant drafts the double materiality chapter for a logistics company's first CSRD-compliant report.
Prompt
I am drafting the double materiality chapter for a logistics company's CSRD report. I have uploaded the following: the completed materiality matrix with scores for 18 topics, summaries of five stakeholder engagement sessions, GRI 3 Material Topics standard, and last year's sustainability report.
Draft the narrative for the three highest-scoring material topics from the matrix. For each topic: (1) explain why it is material under both impact materiality and financial materiality using the evidence in the stakeholder summaries and matrix scores, (2) describe the company's current response to the topic using information from last year's report where available, and (3) identify where the current response appears weak relative to the stakeholder expectations documented in the engagement summaries. Write at a register appropriate for the published report.What to add to your library
- Required: your materiality assessment outputs: the matrix, topic scores, and the stakeholder input behind the rankings.
- Required: the relevant sections of the standard you report against (GRI 3, CSRD ESRS, or both).
- Optional: prior sustainability reports, so Anara matches house style.
- Optional: stakeholder engagement summaries or survey data, the evidence base for impact materiality.
What you get
- A per-topic narrative covering the materiality rationale and the company's current response.
- Gaps between stated commitments and what the stakeholder evidence shows.
- Working text your team reviews and integrates into the full report.
Follow-ups
Find gaps between commitments and expectations.
Prompt
Compare what the company says it is doing on climate transition risk (from last year's report and any current policy documents in my library) against what the stakeholder engagement summaries show they expect. Where are the most significant gaps? Format this as a gap table I can bring to the internal review meeting.Check the draft against ESRS disclosure requirements.
Prompt
Review the draft narrative for climate-related physical risks against the ESRS E1 disclosure requirements I have uploaded. Identify any required disclosure element that the draft does not address. For each gap, quote the specific ESRS requirement and describe what additional information would be needed to meet it.Tips
- Name the standard explicitly. CSRD under ESRS and GRI 3 call for different narrative structures.
- Draft three to five topics per session. The full chapter in one prompt needs more revision.
- Inputs you never uploaded, like workshop notes, are invisible to Anara. Add missing context to the prompt directly.