View as Markdown

Screen abstracts

Screen abstracts against your inclusion criteria before you import.

Paste your inclusion and exclusion criteria with an abstract and Anara returns include, exclude, or uncertain, naming the criterion that drove the decision. Use it on a shortlist you have already narrowed down, before committing to full-text import. For ten-thousand-record exports, dedicated tools like Rayyan or Covidence are built for the scale.

Prompt

A public health PhD student screens sixty-three abstracts for a review on compassion fatigue interventions in emergency service workers.

Prompt
I am screening abstracts for a systematic review on compassion fatigue interventions in emergency service workers. My inclusion and exclusion criteria are:

Inclusion: peer-reviewed empirical studies, participants are emergency service workers (police, fire, paramedics, or similar), intervention addresses compassion fatigue or secondary traumatic stress, published 2010 or later.
Exclusion: case studies or anecdotal reports, participants are exclusively healthcare workers (not emergency services), no measurable outcome reported, non-English language.

Apply these criteria to the following abstract. Return: decision (Include / Exclude / Uncertain), which criteria drove the decision, and one sentence explaining the judgment.

[Paste the abstract here]

What to add to your library

  • Required: your inclusion and exclusion criteria, stated clearly.
  • Required: the abstract or set of abstracts to screen.
  • Optional: an already-decided include and exclude from the same review, as calibration.
  • Optional: your PICO framework, applied alongside the written criteria.

What you get

  • A decision per abstract with the triggering criterion named and a one-sentence rationale.
  • For uncertain decisions, the specific ambiguous criterion flagged for your judgment.
  • A consistent, documented record of your screening process. The final call stays yours.

Follow-ups

Screen a batch of ten at once.

Prompt
Apply the same screening criteria to the following ten abstracts. Return a numbered list: each abstract number, the decision (Include / Exclude / Uncertain), and the one-sentence rationale. Flag any abstract where the decision is uncertain and explain which criterion is unclear.

[Paste ten abstracts, numbered 1 through 10]

Save the session as a screening log.

Prompt
Save all the screening decisions from this session as a note called "Screening Log: Compassion Fatigue Review." Format as a table: abstract number, title (from the abstract), decision, and rationale.

Tips

  • Put each criterion on its own line. The rationale gets more specific about which one triggered.
  • Name known edge cases in the criteria so Anara applies a rule instead of making a judgment.
  • Treat Uncertain as a cue for full-text review, not an automatic exclude.
  • Once screening is done, move included papers to the systematic extraction workflow.