Check a slide headline
Draft a regulatory-compatible slide headline from clinical study data.
Paste a draft slide headline and point Anara at the underlying study. Anara checks the wording against the study design, patient population, and reported result, then suggests revised options that stay defensible. Use it when a headline has been iterated on and still overstates or undersells the data.
Prompt
A medical communications writer drafts the headline for a projection model slide on MACE event reduction.
Prompt
I am drafting a headline for a slide about MACE event reduction in patients with prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The underlying study is already in my library. Here is my current draft headline:
"Comprehensive Risk Factor Control, Led by Intensive LDL-C Lowering, Can Substantially Reduce Projected CV Events"
Check this wording against the study in my library. Tell me:
- Is "comprehensive risk factor control" accurate given what the study modeled?
- Is "substantially reduce" supported by the magnitude of the effect reported?
- Does "projected CV events" accurately reflect the study design (a modeling study, not a clinical trial)?
If anything is inaccurate or overstated, suggest revised wording that is accurate and still communicates the clinical story.What to add to your library
- Required: the source study.
- Required: your current draft headline or callout.
- Optional: the study design type (RCT, modeling study, observational), so Anara can flag mismatches with the wording.
- Optional: the chart type the headline accompanies. Different visualizations support different claim strengths.
What you get
- A line-by-line accuracy assessment of the headline.
- The study passage that supports or contradicts each phrase.
- Alternative wording wherever the draft overstates, simplifies, or mischaracterizes the design.
Follow-ups
Check the footnote attribution.
Prompt
Here is the footnote I have drafted for this slide: "Projections derived by applying age-, sex-, and race-specific prevalence estimates from the NHANES 2013-2016 cohort to a standard Markov model."
Check this footnote against the methods section of the study. Is the description of the modeling methodology accurate? Flag any phrase that misrepresents what the paper actually did.Draft a shorter callout version.
Prompt
The headline we validated is accurate but runs to 17 words. Draft three alternative versions under 12 words that preserve the key clinical claim: intensive LDL-C lowering as the leading driver of projected CV event reduction. All three should be defensible based on the study we checked.Tips
- Break the headline into phrases and ask about each. That gets a precise verdict on the phrase a reviewer will flag.
- Name the study design. "Substantially reduces" means something different for a Markov projection than for an RCT.
- Anara's verdict is the first gate, not the last. A statistically accurate headline may still be inappropriate under promotional guidelines.