Skip to main content
Name a term, a concept, a methodology, or an author name and Anara searches your entire library and returns every passage where it appears, organized by document. You see how many papers mention it, what each one says about it, and which papers treat it most centrally. For tracing how a concept moves across your collection.

1. Describe the task

You are not looking for papers that support an argument. You are looking for every place a specific term appears in your library, because you want to see the full range of how it is used, defined, and contested across everything you have uploaded. Anara runs a targeted search across your entire library and returns every passage where the term appears, organized by document. The output shows you which papers mention the concept at all, which treat it centrally, and how the usage varies. This is the concept-tracing workflow: before you write the section on how your field uses a term, you want to know what your library actually has on it. Here a PhD student in sociology is writing a chapter on how the concept of gendered racism operates in educational literature and wants to trace every appearance of the term across her library of 90 papers before she writes her theoretical framework.
Search my entire library for every passage where "gendered racism" appears. I want to see all of them, not just the top few. Organize the results by document, with the document name and every relevant passage from that document listed together.

For each passage, include the page reference if available. After listing all the passages, tell me: which three papers treat gendered racism most centrally based on how many times it appears and how it is framed?

2. Give Anara context

Required context
  • Your library, or a specific folder if you want to scope the search to a subset of your papers.
Optional context
  • Variant terms or synonyms you want included in the same search (for example, “racialized gender” or “intersectional discrimination” alongside your primary term).
  • A note on whether you want semantic matches (conceptually related content) or exact-term matches only. For tracing a specific technical term, keyword mode catches what semantic mode may miss.

3. What Anara creates

A document-by-document list of every passage where the term appears, with page references and clickable citation badges linking back to the source. Anara then names the papers where the term appears most frequently and explains how they frame it. The output is a term frequency and usage map for your theoretical framework: you know what your library says about the concept and where the most substantive treatments are before you write a word.

4. Follow-up prompts

Trace how the definition shifts across papers

When different papers in the results use the same term differently and you want to document the variation.
Three of the papers you found define gendered racism differently. Pull the specific definitions from each and show them side by side. Note whether any paper explicitly distinguishes its definition from another paper's or acknowledges the variation in how the term is used across the literature.

Find papers that do not use the term but should

When you want to identify which papers in your library address the concept under a different label.
Now search my library for papers that discuss the intersection of race and gender in educational contexts without using the term "gendered racism." I want to find papers that are conceptually relevant but use different vocabulary. Return the papers and the passages that show the conceptual overlap.

Build a usage timeline across publication years

When you are tracing how the concept has evolved and want to see when it entered your library’s literature.
From the papers where "gendered racism" appeared, organize the results by publication year, earliest to most recent. I want to see whether the term's usage or framing has shifted over time based on how the papers in my library use it.

5. Tricks, tips, and troubleshooting

How you word your prompt shapes what you get

The distinction between this workflow and argumentative-support search matters. If you ask “which papers support my argument that gendered racism operates in education,” Anara searches for passages confirming a specific claim. If you ask “search my entire library for every mention of the term gendered racism,” Anara returns comprehensive coverage, including papers that use the term neutrally or tangentially. For exact terminology, request keyword mode explicitly: it ensures Anara looks for the precise string rather than semantically similar content.

Check the output against your own understanding

Anara retrieves passages by search, not by reading every word of every paper. A paper that uses a term only in passing may appear with fewer passages than one that integrates it centrally. If a paper you know discusses a concept does not show up, add a synonym to the search or ask Anara to search that specific paper for the term directly. The document-by-document view helps you notice which papers you expected to see but did not.

What to do with the output next

Use the passage list as the raw material for your theoretical framework section. Papers with the most passages and the most substantive framing are your primary sources. Papers that appear tangentially are secondary mentions. Once you have the full landscape, use the cross-library argumentative-support search as the natural complement: once you know who uses the term, ask which of those papers supports the specific claim you want to make.